Politics, Ritual Abuse and Power
How The Truth Is Abused, Weaponised And Then Buried
Whilst conducting some recent research for a forthcoming documentary I am set to present on the ancient origins of Satanic abuse, I came across the McMartin Day Care Case.
Whilst the argument continues as too wether these crimes actually happened or not, and all parties were quitted. This case does show how Satanic Ritual Abuse cases can be used and weaponised for political purposes.
This article is not about wether the McMartins were guilty of these crimes. They were acquitted twice in a court of law and it is down to you wether you believe this to be the correct outcome, regardless of my own personal opinion.
This article seeks to highlight the shallow nature of the entire global political system and how it has no problem using child sexual abuse as a tool for political gain, power and prestige. With a total disregard for all those involved including both the accusers and and accused. In the world of politics all are fair game.
The truth about the crimes is often the last thing in mind when these politicians at elite and even local levels are using CSA and RSA (Ritual Sexual Abuse) cases to get themselves elected or to manipulate and control each other.
It’s a swamp, and those who manage to keep their head above the muddy water care little for truth and justice even when it comes to child abuse. In fact these sorts of crimes appear to be a way in to politics for many high level figures.
Nothing But The Truth
The sad truth is that the Satanic abuse of children and sacrificial rituals have been going on for thousands of years in “elite” circles that reach into the heart of local governments, institutions, politics, clubs and the epicentres of all global control.
It is weapon for control, a power play, a sickness and a mode for kompromat (see Jeffery Epstein and Jimmy Savile).
We need look no further than the numerous accounts of sacrificial rituals from the pages of the Biblical text. Such as Abraham being told to sacrifice is most beloved son Isaac to the demonic God Yahweh (Elohim). He was set to pass him through the fire as is the case with the Bohemian Grove ritual to Moloch.
We also have the story of Cronus who is Saturn, devouring his own children until his wife Rhea tricked him into eating a rock believing he had eaten his son Zeus. Zeus was then spirited away to Mt. Dikte on the island of Crete where he was raised by the primeval goddess Gaia (Earth), or in some versions by the Nymphs.
Zeus later returned as an adult to revenge his father Cronus as well as free a number of his siblings and banish Cronus to the Underworld.
Of course these are allegorical stories, which in the case of Cronus and Zeus contains the lesson that what you do to one person will one day be done to you. Cronus (Kronos) emasculated his own father Uranus, which he then feared would eventually happen to him by his own sons (thus he devoured them). As destiny would have it, this would happen when Zeus returned to reap his revenge.
The Grimm Reaper is actually another depiction of Cronus who is also known as Saturn, Old Father Time, Satan, Santa and Death. You could also include the figures Moloch, The Screech Owl and Baal as other depictions of the same character as well as Yahweh.
Tunnels To Truth
Accounts from the children of the McMartin Day Care Centre are often overshadow by the arguments surrounding the adults involved. Years after the case was closed an archaeologist named E. Gary Stickel was hired to further investigate the possibility of tunnels underneath the day care centre which were reported by a number of children. Mr Stickel’s report claimed to have found evidence of those tunnels. One of the pieces of evidence produced by Stickel'‘s team was a metal plate with a Pentagram engraved on it. But as you research deeper other reports about that report make a counter claim.
The result of all of this confusion and counter claims is that the public get tired, confused, worn out and end up arguing amongst themselves on chat boards and in the Youtube Comments and nothing ever gets solved.
The waters are muddied from the start!
This counter argument against Mr Gary Stickel’ report was written by a W. Joseph Wyatt of Manhattan University. This report is a fascinating insight into not only the account itself but into the left sided academic mindset that tries to disqualify anything they don’t understand with “logic” whilst at the same time accusing Gary Stickel of “confirmation Bias”. Oh the irony!
What I will say is this.
Both accounts appear to have validity and it maybe that Jospeh Wyatt is correct in that what Gary Stickel actually found was a “rural families trash pit” but it was Gary Stickel who actually went to the site with his team to conduct the search and not Jospeh Wyatt who is merely conducting another layer of analysis on top of that one.
The waters get muddier!
Both Gary Stickel and Jospeh Wyatt are susceptible to confirmation bias, as am I, as are we all. At the end of the day none of us were there and non of us have all the answers. What we do know is that the accounts of Satanic ritual child abuse by organised groups of highly connected people go back thousands of years. And reaches into the upper echelons of society. Especially through politics and royalty.
Another point to consider is that at least two young children separately reported being taken out of the building via these tunnels. Both of these children pointed to the same spot at the School where they said the tunnel entrance once was. These children were in different years and different ages so were not in the same class together, yet corroborated each others stories.
As an adult one of those children said she remembers being in what to her “felt like a tunnel” and seeing “pictures of the devil”. Remember Stickel’s team found a metal plate engrave with a pentagram as well as some Disney paraphernalia. Disney has long been linked to Mind Control and Hollywood RSA.
The Case in Point
In the 1980’s members of the McMartin family were accused of hundreds of acts of child abuse taking place at their preschool in Manhattan Beach California. The initial accusations were made in 1983 by parents of the children. This was an historic trial that took place from 1987 to 1990 and actually conducted over two separate trials.
This was an investigation that spanned seven years and is said to have cost the US Government $23,000 a day, involved an incredible 124 witness and produced 50,000 pages of transcripts. In the end the McMartins were quitted on all accounts.
Many mainstream journalists world wide dismissed the entire case as part of a nation wide “Satanic Panic” and likened it to the Salem Witch Trials. What they won’t mention is that it was the Satanic King James of England and Scotland that caused the same types of Witch Trials and murders that went on to produce the version of the Christian Bible that most people swear on today.
Judy Johnson Character Assassination
The first accusation reportedly came from Judy Johnson who claimed that her son said he was abused by McMartin teacher Ray Buckey. It appears there are conflicting accounts of weather the child did actually make these accusations. Ray Buckey was the grandson of school founder Virginia McMartin and son of administrator Peggy McMartin Buckey.
Other accusations were aimed at Peggy Buckey, with Judy Johnson’s son claiming Peggy had “Drilled a child under the arms” which could be seen as an injection of some sort and that “Ray flew in the air” which again may have been the effects of the drug that was administrated.
A letter was then sent to over 200 parents of the McMartin school from the Manhattan Police Department who asked them to question their children about any abuse that may have happened.
Of course Judy Johnson was later painted as being an “acute paranoid schizophrenic” and in 1986, just three years after her initial accusations, she was found dead in her apartment apparently from acute alcoholism. It just so happened this she was alleged to have “drank herself to death” on the night before she was due to testify in court. The accusations of Judy being an alcoholic came from investigators who spent time with her on the behalf of the defence attorney Walter Urban.
The Children In Question
Reports of the questioning of the children and later examinations were categorised as being “highly suggestive” which is the usual avenue used for completely dismissing allegations of any organised Satanic nature.
This has been the basis for the what was later termed False Memory Syndrome, which I personally do not dismiss entirely. As an element of OCD I do believe that false memories can be implanted or suggested. What we should keep in mind in this case is that this would have had to happen 360 times, which is the number of accounts of CSA initially related to this case.
This brings me back to the overview of Gary Sikel’s archaeological findings in regards to the alleged underground tunnels by W Jospeh Wyatt, who dismissed the findings as being a “rural families trash pit” and down to Sikel’s “cognitive bias”.
Many people will not know that psychology is a pseudo science. It is not a science at all but an ever expanded set of tick lists that have gone from 102 Mental disorders in the first DSM-1 to the DSM 5 having well over 300 mental disorders. The sad reality is that psychology and the mental health profession is Big Pharma business.
One of the most disturbing accusations made by the children was that of a game called “naked movie star” where children were made to strip naked and be photographed. During the court case some of the children later claimed that this was a rhyme that went "What you say is what you are, you're a naked movie star" and was a taunt the kids used to tease other children! These were pre school kids remember, so I for one do not buy this explanation.
The defence lawyers dismissed this accessions as the children testimonies didn’t all match up. Remember these children were five years old when the were cross examined in the court.
By 1984 it was claimed that 360 children had been abused at the day care centre. 41 of those 360 children testified in the grand jury and fewer than a dozen testified in the final trial. Wikipedia would have you think that this was because there was no evidence but that dismisses that fact that there were pre school children and that if this was indeed the case then most of the initial 360 accusations were never examined in a court of law.
So contrary to this being a positive outlook for the defendants, it is actually worse when considered properly.
All in all there were never any convictions and the trials ultimately collapsed due to lack of evidence. As it stands today Peggy McMartin Buckey was acquitted on all counts and Ray Buckey was cleared on all accounts also. In a court of law they are innocent. And let’s remember that no photographic evidence was ever found, and the evidence of tunnels is less than convincing at the time of this writing.
Elizabeth Cioffi attended the McMartin school as a child and remembers being interviewed about the allegations of abuse at CII by child psychologists. Still to this day she is adamant that she remembers being abused by Ray Buckey . Her parents spoke to the Uncovered documentary team saying that they believe their daughter Elizabeth was abused.
The medical doctor who examined the children was Astrid Heger M.D. She says she got involved with the McMartin case because she began to question why CSA cases rarely went to court. The investigations by the medical doctors at CII concluded that some of the children had “enough physical evidence that something had happened”.
Media, Money And Motives
So if we are to believe that all of these allegations are completely made up, then what are the motives for the lies? why would over 360 children all lie about incidents that never happened?
In a recorded phone call with a journalist Virginia McMartin was asked ‘so you think you are being framed’ to this Virginia McMartin replied “I don’t think it, I know it”.
Virginia McMartin who was the founder of the pre school had received the prestigious Rose and Scroll award in 1977 which is the cities highest honour.
This piece of often overlooked information shows two things. First it shows that Virginia McMartin was very well connected, in that these honours are often given out to a small select group of individuals (the club). Secondly this may have been a reason as to why someone within that select club in Manhattan may have been jealous of her?
Or perhaps she was aware of this type of abuse going on within her political circles and they tried to pin it on her and her family? It is entirely possible that the McMartins were framed, or that the abuse happened but not all the McMartins were aware of it.
The above image is from the Rose and Scroll Awards dinner in 1975 , two years before Virginia McMartin won her award. This clearly shows the who’s who of Manhattan attended these award ceremonies, such as the Mayor Joan Dontanville and State Senator Bob Beverly. These were the circles in which the McMartins swam in.
The documentary by Uncovered shows various parents saying that those who taught at this “prestigious school” were teachers that had been at the school for “dozens of years” with most of the teachers now being older. Again we have evidence that this was a select circle of people surrounding this school, and that the McMartin family were held in high prestige in the community.
Some investigators have suggested an alarm system was built into the pre school to warn the McMartins that a parent had turned up un announced. The Uncovered documentary claims that in 1984 the Grand Jury issued a 105 count indictment against Ray Buckey, his mother and five other teachers.
Yet as one Defence Attorney Forest Latiner said in the above mentioned documentary, there was nothing to suggest any perverse behaviour from Ray Buckey before these allegations were made.
Another astonishing piece of information revealed in the documentary is that the reporter Wayne Satz of KABC News was actually dating the psychologists who was asked to work with the children. Her name was Kee MacFarlane who introduced a controversial “puppet therapy” when conducting her work with the children. This was later used to discredit any accounts of child abuse due to its suggestive nature.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Richard Willett SOME MAY CONSPIRE to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.